Why traditional data quality is no longer enough

Modern enterprise data platforms operate at a petabyte scale, ingest fully unstructured sources, and evolve constantly. In such environments, rule-based data quality systems fail to keep pace. They depend on manual constraint definitions that do not generalize to messy, high-dimensional, fast-changing data.

This is where AI-augmented data quality engineering emerges. It shifts data quality from deterministic, Boolean checks to probabilistic, generative, and self-learning systems.

AI-driven DQ frameworks use:

  • Deep learning for semantic inference
  • Transformers for ontology alignment
  • GANs and VAEs for anomaly detection
  • LLMs for automated repair
  • Reinforcement learning to continuously assess and update trust scores

The result is a self-healing data ecosystem that adapts to concept drift and scales alongside growing enterprise complexity.

Automated semantic inference: Understanding data without rules

Traditional schema inference tools rely on simple pattern matching. But modern datasets contain ambiguous headers, mixed-value formats, and incomplete metadata. Deep learning models solve this by learning latent semantic representations.

Sherlock: Multi-input deep learning for column classification

Sherlock, developed at MIT, analyzes more than 1,588 statistical, lexical, and embedding features to classify columns into semantic types with extremely high accuracy.

Sherlock does not rely on rules like “five digits = ZIP code.” Instead, it examines distribution patterns, character entropy, word embeddings, and contextual behavior to classify fields such as:

  • ZIP code or employee ID
  • Price or age
  • Country or city

This dramatically improves accuracy when column names are missing or misleading.

Sato: Context-aware semantic typing using table-level intelligence

Sato extends Sherlock by incorporating context across the full table. It uses topic modeling, context vectors, and structured prediction (CRF) to understand relationships between columns.

This allows Sato to differentiate between:

  • A person’s name in HR data
  • A city name in demographic data
  • A product name in retail data

Sato improves macro-average F1 by roughly 14 percent over Sherlock in noisy environments and works well in data lakes and uncurated ingestion pipelines.

Ontology alignment using transformers

Large organizations manage dozens of schemas across different systems. Manual mapping is slow and inconsistent. Transformer-based models fix this by understanding deep semantic relationships inside schema descriptions.

BERTMap: Transformer-based schema and ontology alignment

BERTMap(AAAI) fine-tunes BERT on ontology text structures and produces consistent mappings even when labels differ entirely.

Examples include:

  • “Cust_ID” mapped to “ClientIdentifier”
  • “DOB” mapped to “BirthDate”
  • “Acct_Num” mapped to “AccountNumber”

It also incorporates logic-based consistency checks that remove mappings that violate established ontology rules.

AI-driven ontology alignment increases interoperability and reduces the need for manual data engineering.

Generative AI for data cleaning, repair and imputation

Generative AI allows automated remediation and not just detection. Instead of engineers writing correction rules, AI learns how the data should behave.

Jellyfish: LLM fine-tuned for data preprocessing

Jellyfish is an instruction-tuned LLM created for data cleaning and transformation tasks such as:

  • Error detection
  • Missing-value imputation
  • Data normalization
  • Schema restructuring

Its knowledge injection mechanism reduces hallucinations by integrating domain constraints during inference.

Enterprise teams use Jellyfish to improve consistency in data processing and reduce manual cleanup time.

ReClean: Reinforcement learning for cleaning sequence optimization

Cleaning pipelines often apply steps in an inefficient order. ReClean frames this as a sequential decision process where an RL agent decides the optimal next cleaning action. The agent receives rewards based on downstream ML performance rather than arbitrary quality rules LIME and SHAP tutorial used in ReClean evaluation.

This ensures that data cleaning directly supports business outcomes.

4. Deep generative models for anomaly detection

Statistical anomaly detection methods fail with high-dimensional and non-linear data. Deep generative models learn the true shape of the data distribution and can measure deviations with greater accuracy.

GAN-based anomaly detection: AnoGAN and DriftGAN

GANs learn what “normal” looks like. During inference:

  • High reconstruction error indicates an anomaly.
  • Low discriminator confidence also indicates an anomaly.

AnoGAN pioneered this technique, while DriftGAN detects changes that signal concept drift, allowing systems to adapt over time.

Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are commonly applied across areas such as fraud detection, financial analysis, cybersecurity, IoT monitoring, and industrial analytics.

Variational autoencoders (VAEs) for probabilistic imputation

VAEs encode data into latent probability distributions, allowing:

  • Advanced missing value imputation
  • Quantification of uncertainty

Effective handling of Missing Not At Random (MNAR) scenarios

Advanced versions such as MIWAE and JAMIE provide high-accuracy imputation even in multimodal data.

This leads to significantly more reliable downstream machine learning models.

5. Building a dynamic AI-driven data trust score

A Data Trust Score quantifies dataset reliability using a weighted combination of:

  • Validity
  • Completeness
  • Consistency
  • Freshness
  • Lineage

Formula example

Trust(t) = ( Σ wi·Di  +  wL·Lineage(L)  +  wF·Freshness(t) ) / Σ wi

Where:

  • Di represents intrinsic quality dimensions
  • Lineage(L) represents upstream quality
  • Freshness(t) models data staleness using exponential decay

Freshness decay and lineage propagation

Freshness loses value naturally as data ages.
Lineage ensures a dataset cannot appear more reliable than its inputs.

These concepts are foundational to the Data Trust Score overview and align closely with Data Mesh governance principles. Trust scoring creates measurable, auditable data health indicators.

Contextual bandits for dynamic trust weighting

Different applications prioritize different quality attributes.

Examples:

  • Dashboards prioritize freshness
  • Compliance teams prioritize completeness
  • AI models prioritize consistency and anomaly reduction

Contextual bandits optimize trust scoring weights based on usage patterns, feedback, and downstream performance.

Explainability: Making AI-driven data quality auditable

Enterprises must understand why AI flags or corrects a record. Explainability ensures transparency and compliance.

SHAP for feature attribution

SHAP quantifies each feature’s contribution to a model prediction, enabling:

  • Root-cause analysis
  • Bias detection
  • Detailed anomaly interpretation

LIME for local interpretability

LIME builds simple local models around a prediction to show how small changes influence outcomes. It answers questions like:

  • “Would correcting age change the anomaly score?”
  • “Would adjusting the ZIP code affect classification?”

Explainability makes AI-based data remediation acceptable in regulated industries.

More reliable systems, less human intervention

AI augmented data quality engineering transforms traditional manual checks into intelligent, automated workflows. By integrating semantic inference, ontology alignment, generative models, anomaly detection frameworks and dynamic trust scoring, organizations create systems that are more reliable, less dependent on human intervention, and better aligned with operational and analytics needs. This evolution is essential for the next generation of data-driven enterprises.

This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.
Want to join?

Read more here: https://www.infoworld.com/article/4128925/ai-augmented-data-quality-engineering.html